header-logo header-logo

25 February 2016 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7688 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

The experts’ view

Mark Solon discusses the current & predicted trends for experts in 2016

The government’s spotlight on expert witnesses has been undimmed over the last year in its continued crackdown on the perceived compensation culture and with its drive to bring down the costs of litigation, particularly in the personal injury field, and especially for cases at the lower end of the spectrum, like whiplash.

Yet despite fee cuts, moves to limit the number of experts giving evidence in cases and the controversial reforms for the instruction of experts in soft tissue cases, the results of the 2015 Bond Solon Expert Witness Survey suggest that it has general been business as usual for most experts, whose work has been undiminished and whose fees have remained static or in some cases increased.

The survey that followed the annual Bond Solon expert witness conference was completed by almost 200 experts across a wide range of specialties.

  • Nearly half (47% ) of the 191 respondents reported an increase in the number of instructions received, going against the grain
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll