Extending privilege beyond the legal profession?

The Law Society is to intervene in a Court of Appeal case that could lead to legal professional privilege being extended beyond the legal profession.

Financial services firm, Prudential will argue that accountants should receive equal treatment with lawyers when disclosing legal advice on certain issues, in Prudential PLC and Prudential (Gibraltar) Limited v Special Commissioner of Income Tax and Philip Pandolfo (HM Inspector of Taxes).

Robert Heslett, president of the Law Society, which has been given permission to intervene in the case, said any extension of the right should be a matter for Parliament and not the courts.

“The case has the potential consequence of giving anyone who describes his/her self as a tax accountant or other professional the ability to withhold vital information from bodies such as HMRC, when legal professional privilege is intended to have a very specific purpose."

Categories: Legal News , Profession

Extending privilege beyond the legal profession?

The Law Society is to intervene in a Court of Appeal case that could lead to legal professional privilege being extended beyond the legal profession.

Robert Heslett, president of the Law Society, which has been given permission to intervene in the case, said any extension of the right should be a matter for Parliament and not the courts.

Categories: Legal News , Profession

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

Read All

NLJ this week: Mazur and more—inside the litigation frontline

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

NLJ this week: Social media bans for children spark legal dilemmas

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation

NLJ this week: Leasehold reform risks creating ‘forgotten freeholders’

Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies

NLJ this week: Court of Appeal clarifies when a claim truly begins

Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid

NLJ this week: Split FDRs could ease pressure—and boost settlements

The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation

Error message

Extending privilege beyond the legal profession?

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Switalskis—three appointments

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions