header-logo header-logo

15 March 2024 / Philip Gardner , Abbie Melvin
Issue: 8063 / Categories: Features , International , Competition , Jurisdiction , Fraud
printer mail-detail

Extraterritorial powers for the CMA?

163900
Can the CMA compel overseas companies to provide information? Philip Gardner & Abbie Melvin explore the recent case law
  • Covers case law on the Competition and Markets Authority’s powers to compel information from overseas companies under s 26, Competition Act 1998.
  • The Court of Appeal recently held the CMA has authority to compel responses from companies with no territorial connection to the UK.
  • Competition lawyers are waiting to hear if the case will be appealed to the Supreme Court.

In January, the Court of Appeal allowed the Competition and Markets Authority’s (CMA’s) appeal against a decision that had denied it the ability to compel, by way of notice under s 26 of the Competition Act 1998 (CA 1998, ‘the Act’), responses to information requests from companies with no territorial connection to the UK, despite having UK-incorporated subsidiaries, in Competition and Markets Authority v Rex on the application of Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft [2024] EWCA Civ 1506.

Given the apparent similarities to the decision in R (on the application of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll