header-logo header-logo

15 March 2024 / Philip Gardner , Abbie Melvin
Issue: 8063 / Categories: Features , International , Competition , Jurisdiction , Fraud
printer mail-detail

Extraterritorial powers for the CMA?

163900
Can the CMA compel overseas companies to provide information? Philip Gardner & Abbie Melvin explore the recent case law
  • Covers case law on the Competition and Markets Authority’s powers to compel information from overseas companies under s 26, Competition Act 1998.
  • The Court of Appeal recently held the CMA has authority to compel responses from companies with no territorial connection to the UK.
  • Competition lawyers are waiting to hear if the case will be appealed to the Supreme Court.

In January, the Court of Appeal allowed the Competition and Markets Authority’s (CMA’s) appeal against a decision that had denied it the ability to compel, by way of notice under s 26 of the Competition Act 1998 (CA 1998, ‘the Act’), responses to information requests from companies with no territorial connection to the UK, despite having UK-incorporated subsidiaries, in Competition and Markets Authority v Rex on the application of Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft [2024] EWCA Civ 1506.

Given the apparent similarities to the decision in R (on the application of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll