header-logo header-logo

25 July 2013 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7570 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Eye on employment

150654799

It’s been a big month in the world of employment law, notes Ian Smith

The last month has seen major legislative changes, with several provisions of the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013 coming into force, the issuing of the new Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure (to come into force on 29 July) and the publication of a Deregulation Bill. It has to be said that the portents for the latter are hopefully to be better than the attempt at such legislation in the mid-1990s when an empowering Act only led to one deregulation order, which in relation to employment law only repealed two provisions—the Home Work (Lampshades) Order 1929 and the Horizontal Milling Machines (Amendment) Regulations 1934, both of which had of course been holding British industry back for years. Against such a backdrop it might be expected that case law would seem relatively sidelined, but the three cases below each make important contributions to the law in their areas.

Wide discretion for surveillance

Issues of covert surveillance can be seen regularly

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll