header-logo header-logo

14 July 2011 / Elizabeth Carson
Issue: 7474 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Fair share

Elizabeth Carson ponders the division of family assets in light of K v L

In the recent case of K v L [2011] EWCA Civ 550, [2011] All ER (D) 124 (May) Lord Justice Wilson, joined by Laws and Jacob LJJ, upheld a decision by Bodey J that restricted a husband’s entitlement, on divorce, to an award that met his needs, generously assessed, despite the fact that the wife’s assets greatly exceeded what either party would require.  

Background

This decision follows the husband’s appeal against an order made by Bodey J, in the High Court, family division. That case is reported under the title K v L (Ancillary Relief: Inherited Wealth) [2010] EWHC 1234 (Fam), [2010] 2 FLR 1467.

Both parties were Israeli citizens. The court regarded them as having been married for 21 years, during which time they had three children, aged 9 to 16 at the time of this judgment. They moved from Israel to the UK in 1991. The marriage broke down in 2007.
At age 15 the wife inherited

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
back-to-top-scroll