header-logo header-logo

14 July 2011 / Elizabeth Carson
Issue: 7474 / Categories: Features , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail

Fair share

Elizabeth Carson ponders the division of family assets in light of K v L

In the recent case of K v L [2011] EWCA Civ 550, [2011] All ER (D) 124 (May) Lord Justice Wilson, joined by Laws and Jacob LJJ, upheld a decision by Bodey J that restricted a husband’s entitlement, on divorce, to an award that met his needs, generously assessed, despite the fact that the wife’s assets greatly exceeded what either party would require.  

Background

This decision follows the husband’s appeal against an order made by Bodey J, in the High Court, family division. That case is reported under the title K v L (Ancillary Relief: Inherited Wealth) [2010] EWHC 1234 (Fam), [2010] 2 FLR 1467.

Both parties were Israeli citizens. The court regarded them as having been married for 21 years, during which time they had three children, aged 9 to 16 at the time of this judgment. They moved from Israel to the UK in 1991. The marriage broke down in 2007.
At age 15 the wife inherited

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll