header-logo header-logo

02 September 2011
Issue: 7479 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Fair trial

Pan v WestLB AG UKEAT/0308/11/DM, [2011] All ER (D) 100 (Aug)

It was established law that the test to be applied in determining bias was whether the fair-minded and informed observer, having considered the facts, would conclude that there was a real possibility that the tribunal was biased. If an objection of bias was made, it was the duty of the tribunal to consider the objection and exercise his judgment upon it. As a matter of discretion, save for compelling reasons, an employment judge in a case which had started before a full panel should, if he was asked to order a hearing before a different panel, ensure that the decision was taken by the whole panel. The question of bias did not simply depend on whether or not the party said that he lacked confidence, but on whether substantively, there were good grounds for such confidence to be lacking.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll