header-logo header-logo

Fair trial

02 September 2011
Issue: 7479 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Pan v WestLB AG UKEAT/0308/11/DM, [2011] All ER (D) 100 (Aug)

It was established law that the test to be applied in determining bias was whether the fair-minded and informed observer, having considered the facts, would conclude that there was a real possibility that the tribunal was biased. If an objection of bias was made, it was the duty of the tribunal to consider the objection and exercise his judgment upon it. As a matter of discretion, save for compelling reasons, an employment judge in a case which had started before a full panel should, if he was asked to order a hearing before a different panel, ensure that the decision was taken by the whole panel. The question of bias did not simply depend on whether or not the party said that he lacked confidence, but on whether substantively, there were good grounds for such confidence to be lacking.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll