header-logo header-logo

19 July 2020
Issue: 7896 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Fair trial for Isis recruit

Shamima Begum, one of three east London schoolgirls who joined Isis in Syria in 2015 when she was 15 years old, will receive a fair trial only if she is allowed to return to the UK, the Court of Appeal has held

Begum is appealing against the government’s decision last February to revoke her citizenship. She is currently living in a refugee camp in Syria. The other two girls are believed to have died.

Ruling in Begum v Special Immigration Appeals Commission & Ors [2020] EWCA Civ 918 last week, Lord Justice Flaux, giving the lead judgment, said it was ‘unthinkable’ that Begum should contest her case from Syria.

On the point of whether she left for Syria of her own free will, Flaux LJ said: ‘I would be uneasy taking a course which, in effect, involved deciding that Ms Begum had left the UK as a 15 year old schoolgirl of her own free will in circumstances where one of the principal reasons why she cannot have a fair and effective appeal is her inability to give proper instructions or provide evidence.’

He agreed with human rights organisation, Liberty, intervening, that that if she can participate in her appeal, then it will be possible to explore the circumstances by which she left the UK, and whether she travelled of her own free will.

Katie Lines, a barrister working as a lawyer at Liberty, said: ‘It is a fundamental part of our justice system and equal access to justice must apply to everyone.’

A Home Office spokesperson said the decision was ‘disappointing’ and they would be seeking leave to appeal.

Issue: 7896 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll