header-logo header-logo

19 July 2020
Issue: 7896 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Fair trial for Isis recruit

Shamima Begum, one of three east London schoolgirls who joined Isis in Syria in 2015 when she was 15 years old, will receive a fair trial only if she is allowed to return to the UK, the Court of Appeal has held

Begum is appealing against the government’s decision last February to revoke her citizenship. She is currently living in a refugee camp in Syria. The other two girls are believed to have died.

Ruling in Begum v Special Immigration Appeals Commission & Ors [2020] EWCA Civ 918 last week, Lord Justice Flaux, giving the lead judgment, said it was ‘unthinkable’ that Begum should contest her case from Syria.

On the point of whether she left for Syria of her own free will, Flaux LJ said: ‘I would be uneasy taking a course which, in effect, involved deciding that Ms Begum had left the UK as a 15 year old schoolgirl of her own free will in circumstances where one of the principal reasons why she cannot have a fair and effective appeal is her inability to give proper instructions or provide evidence.’

He agreed with human rights organisation, Liberty, intervening, that that if she can participate in her appeal, then it will be possible to explore the circumstances by which she left the UK, and whether she travelled of her own free will.

Katie Lines, a barrister working as a lawyer at Liberty, said: ‘It is a fundamental part of our justice system and equal access to justice must apply to everyone.’

A Home Office spokesperson said the decision was ‘disappointing’ and they would be seeking leave to appeal.

Issue: 7896 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll