header-logo header-logo

18 October 2007 / Michael Salter , Chris Bryden
Issue: 7293 / Categories: Features , Banking , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Faking it

Beware false documentation, say Chris Bryden
and Michael Salter

A recent article in the Money section of The Times (14 July 2007) highlights the ability of unscrupulous would-be borrowers to artificially increase their demonstrable income to convince lenders to provide higher mortgages by way of false P60s, bank statements and other documents downloaded from the internet.

The report cites the Building Societies Association, which states that the use of such statements in mortgage applications is “rife”. Anyone using such documents to obtain a pecuniary advantage is liable to prosecution for theft or fraud-related offences. The sites offering this service insist that their activity is legal, billing themselves as providing a genuine service for those whose P60s are handwritten and therefore unacceptable, or have been lost; or simply for novelty purposes.

For legal practitioners there are more pressing concerns arising from the ease with which such documents can be obtained. It appears that bank statements from all the major banks can be quickly and easily created, with tailored details based on the location

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll