header-logo header-logo

18 October 2007 / Michael Salter , Chris Bryden
Issue: 7293 / Categories: Features , Banking , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Faking it

Beware false documentation, say Chris Bryden
and Michael Salter

A recent article in the Money section of The Times (14 July 2007) highlights the ability of unscrupulous would-be borrowers to artificially increase their demonstrable income to convince lenders to provide higher mortgages by way of false P60s, bank statements and other documents downloaded from the internet.

The report cites the Building Societies Association, which states that the use of such statements in mortgage applications is “rife”. Anyone using such documents to obtain a pecuniary advantage is liable to prosecution for theft or fraud-related offences. The sites offering this service insist that their activity is legal, billing themselves as providing a genuine service for those whose P60s are handwritten and therefore unacceptable, or have been lost; or simply for novelty purposes.

For legal practitioners there are more pressing concerns arising from the ease with which such documents can be obtained. It appears that bank statements from all the major banks can be quickly and easily created, with tailored details based on the location

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Heavyweight patent litigator will bolster Carpmaels Ransford’s rapidly growing Litigation team as firm marks its 250th anniversary

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll