header-logo header-logo

18 October 2007 / Michael Salter , Chris Bryden
Issue: 7293 / Categories: Features , Banking , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Faking it

Beware false documentation, say Chris Bryden
and Michael Salter

A recent article in the Money section of The Times (14 July 2007) highlights the ability of unscrupulous would-be borrowers to artificially increase their demonstrable income to convince lenders to provide higher mortgages by way of false P60s, bank statements and other documents downloaded from the internet.

The report cites the Building Societies Association, which states that the use of such statements in mortgage applications is “rife”. Anyone using such documents to obtain a pecuniary advantage is liable to prosecution for theft or fraud-related offences. The sites offering this service insist that their activity is legal, billing themselves as providing a genuine service for those whose P60s are handwritten and therefore unacceptable, or have been lost; or simply for novelty purposes.

For legal practitioners there are more pressing concerns arising from the ease with which such documents can be obtained. It appears that bank statements from all the major banks can be quickly and easily created, with tailored details based on the location

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Mark Hastings, Quillon Law

NLJ Career Profile: Mark Hastings, Quillon Law

Mark Hastings, founding partner of Quillon Law, on turning dreams into reality and pushing back on preconceptions about partnership

Kingsley Napley—Silvia Devecchi

Kingsley Napley—Silvia Devecchi

New family law partner for Italian and international clients appointed

Mishcon de Reya—Susannah Kintish

Mishcon de Reya—Susannah Kintish

Firm elects new chair of tier 1 ranked employment department

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll