header-logo header-logo

26 June 2009 / Philip Thornton
Issue: 7375 / Categories: Features , Terms&conditions , LexisPSL , Employment
printer mail-detail

The fall-out from Stringer

Post Stringer, Philip Thornton considers holiday pay rights for those on long-term sick leave

The litigation in Stringer v HMRC [2009] UKHL 31, [2009] All ER (D) 168 (Jun) previously known as Ainsworth, goes back to employment tribunal judgments from 2003. The case made its way up through the appellate system, was the subject of a reference to the European Court of Justice (ECJ), and the House of Lords finally handed down judgment on 10 June 2009.

It was hoped that the House of Lords would clarify many unanswered questions about the law relating to statutory annual leave, but those hopes have, after all this time, been dashed. This article seeks to unscramble the post-Stringer state of the law, setting out both what we know, and what remains unresolved.

Only two points of law are mentioned in the House of Lords’ judgments:
l the issue of whether statutory annual leave may be taken during periods that a worker is off sick; and

l whether a failure to pay a worker in respect of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll