header-logo header-logo

26 June 2009 / Philip Thornton
Issue: 7375 / Categories: Features , Terms&conditions , LexisPSL , Employment
printer mail-detail

The fall-out from Stringer

Post Stringer, Philip Thornton considers holiday pay rights for those on long-term sick leave

The litigation in Stringer v HMRC [2009] UKHL 31, [2009] All ER (D) 168 (Jun) previously known as Ainsworth, goes back to employment tribunal judgments from 2003. The case made its way up through the appellate system, was the subject of a reference to the European Court of Justice (ECJ), and the House of Lords finally handed down judgment on 10 June 2009.

It was hoped that the House of Lords would clarify many unanswered questions about the law relating to statutory annual leave, but those hopes have, after all this time, been dashed. This article seeks to unscramble the post-Stringer state of the law, setting out both what we know, and what remains unresolved.

Only two points of law are mentioned in the House of Lords’ judgments:
l the issue of whether statutory annual leave may be taken during periods that a worker is off sick; and

l whether a failure to pay a worker in respect of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll