header-logo header-logo

The fall-out from Stringer

26 June 2009 / Philip Thornton
Issue: 7375 / Categories: Features , Terms&conditions , LexisPSL , Employment
printer mail-detail

Post Stringer, Philip Thornton considers holiday pay rights for those on long-term sick leave

The litigation in Stringer v HMRC [2009] UKHL 31, [2009] All ER (D) 168 (Jun) previously known as Ainsworth, goes back to employment tribunal judgments from 2003. The case made its way up through the appellate system, was the subject of a reference to the European Court of Justice (ECJ), and the House of Lords finally handed down judgment on 10 June 2009.

It was hoped that the House of Lords would clarify many unanswered questions about the law relating to statutory annual leave, but those hopes have, after all this time, been dashed. This article seeks to unscramble the post-Stringer state of the law, setting out both what we know, and what remains unresolved.

Only two points of law are mentioned in the House of Lords’ judgments:
l the issue of whether statutory annual leave may be taken during periods that a worker is off sick; and

l whether a failure to pay a worker in respect of statutory

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll