header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
24 July 2013
Issue: 7570 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Family

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Re ML (a child) (use of Skype Technology) [2013] EWHC 2091 (Fam), [2013] All ER (D) 232 (Jul)

The judgment recorded the use made of Skype technology in two recent cases. The first case concerned the adoption of a girl from Nepal. The judge directed that the parents should be contacted and offered the opportunity to give their consent. It was not possible for the children's guardian to make those enquiries abroad. A local lawyer was engaged and arrangements were made for the court documents to be translated and sent to the lawyer. Using Skype, the guardian and the child's solicitor were able to witness in real time the parents signing the consent forms, and photographs of the events were taken. The process satisfied the judge that the parents had freely and unconditionally consented to the adoption, and also that they had received no financial inducement. The second case concerned an application for relocation to Columbia. Evidence was required from a witness in Columbia. She lived in a remote location with few options available to her in respect

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll