header-logo header-logo

27 May 2010 / Mark Irving
Issue: 7419 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Family law

What does the coalition government mean for family law reform? Mark Irving reports

On 11 May 2010, having kissed hands with the Queen, David Cameron stood before the world’s press outside 10 Downing Street and declared: “I want us to build a society with stronger families…this is going to be hard and difficult work.”

The following day, a thumbnail coalition agreement was published which barely mentioned family policy, other than in the guise of taxation policy. On 20 May, the government published its Programme for government, but during its one hour long press launch, family policy was mentioned only in passing during Nick Clegg’s introductory statement. The programme itself lists 13 commitments for family and children, but some difficult family law issues have been sidestepped. There was no mention of family law reform in the Queen’s Speech on 25 May.

Deeper investigation reveals an important reason for such ducking and diving. In many respects Liberal Democrat and Conservative policies relating to the family have been, and evidently still are, diametrically opposed.
So what are the key

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll