header-logo header-logo

Family law

27 May 2010 / Mark Irving
Issue: 7419 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

What does the coalition government mean for family law reform? Mark Irving reports

On 11 May 2010, having kissed hands with the Queen, David Cameron stood before the world’s press outside 10 Downing Street and declared: “I want us to build a society with stronger families…this is going to be hard and difficult work.”

The following day, a thumbnail coalition agreement was published which barely mentioned family policy, other than in the guise of taxation policy. On 20 May, the government published its Programme for government, but during its one hour long press launch, family policy was mentioned only in passing during Nick Clegg’s introductory statement. The programme itself lists 13 commitments for family and children, but some difficult family law issues have been sidestepped. There was no mention of family law reform in the Queen’s Speech on 25 May.

Deeper investigation reveals an important reason for such ducking and diving. In many respects Liberal Democrat and Conservative policies relating to the family have been, and evidently still are, diametrically opposed.
So what are the key

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll