header-logo header-logo

27 May 2010 / Mark Irving
Issue: 7419 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Family law

What does the coalition government mean for family law reform? Mark Irving reports

On 11 May 2010, having kissed hands with the Queen, David Cameron stood before the world’s press outside 10 Downing Street and declared: “I want us to build a society with stronger families…this is going to be hard and difficult work.”

The following day, a thumbnail coalition agreement was published which barely mentioned family policy, other than in the guise of taxation policy. On 20 May, the government published its Programme for government, but during its one hour long press launch, family policy was mentioned only in passing during Nick Clegg’s introductory statement. The programme itself lists 13 commitments for family and children, but some difficult family law issues have been sidestepped. There was no mention of family law reform in the Queen’s Speech on 25 May.

Deeper investigation reveals an important reason for such ducking and diving. In many respects Liberal Democrat and Conservative policies relating to the family have been, and evidently still are, diametrically opposed.
So what are the key

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll