header-logo header-logo

Family mediation: it’s good to talk

06 December 2024 / David Emmerson OBE
Issue: 8097 / Categories: Features , Family , Mediation , ADR
printer mail-detail
200348
Changes to the FPR are resulting in more referrals to mediation. David Emmerson OBE explores the new provisions & their impact on practitioners & clients
  • Sets out the changes to the FPR, which came in earlier this year, and discusses in detail private financial dispute resolutions and early neutral evaluations, including their benefits and differences.

Important changes were introduced in April 2024 to the Family Procedure Rules (FPR), in particular to FPR Pt 3, which has been underused. The family court has wide powers and:

(i) FPR 1.4(1) provides that the court ‘must further the overriding objective by actively managing cases’; and

(ii) FPR 1.4(2)(f) states that active case management includes ‘encouraging the parties to use a non-court dispute resolution procedure if the court considers that appropriate and facilitating the use of such procedure’.

The definition of ‘non-court dispute resolution’ (NCDR) at FPR 2.3(1)(b) was widened to mean:

‘methods of resolving a dispute other than through the court process, including but not limited to mediation, arbitration, evaluation

To access this full article please fill the form below.
All fields are mandatory unless marked as 'Optional'.
If you already a subscriber to New Law Journal, please login here

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bloomsbury Square Employment Law—Donna Clancy

Bloomsbury Square Employment Law—Donna Clancy

Employment law team strengthened with partner appointment

mfg Solicitors—Matt Smith

mfg Solicitors—Matt Smith

Corporate solicitor joins as partner in Birmingham

Freeths—Joe Lythgoe

Freeths—Joe Lythgoe

Corporate director with expertise in creative industries joins mergers and acquisitions team

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll