header-logo header-logo

25 November 2016
Issue: 7724 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Family proceedings

Re JS (Disposal of Body) [2016] EWHC 2859 (Fam), [2016] All ER (D) 100 (Nov)

The Family Division, in granting the application of JS, a 14-year-old girl with terminal cancer, held that it had the power to make an order in which, among other things, the arrangements for preservation of her body would be delegated to her mother. In the unusual and difficult circumstances of the case, in which JS’s mother supported her wish to be cryopreserved after death, and her father opposed it, the court had the power to make a decision with prospective effect where JS’s present welfare could not have been adequately protected otherwise.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Walkers—Muriel Marseille

Ashurst's Chief Risk Officer joins Walkers

Excello Law—John Osborne

Excello Law—John Osborne

Northern family lawyer John Osborne joins Excello

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

mfg Solicitors—Rebecca Rogers, Kennedy Langley & Victoria Griffiths

Trio of promotions announced at Kidderminster law firm mfg Solicitors

NEWS
A sole director can conspire with their own company for the purposes of the tort of unlawful means conspiracy, the High Court has ruled in a judgment with potentially wide implications for business disputes
The Court of Appeal has reinforced that domicile depends on intention rather than residence alone, in a significant post-Brexit ruling on cross-border financial remedy claims
The Chancery Division's long history comes to an end this autumn as it is reborn as the Business and Property Division, prompting questions over whether the shake-up is really necessary
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
back-to-top-scroll