header-logo header-logo

24 April 2026 / Thomas Boyce
Issue: 8158 / Categories: Features , Profession , Diversity , Equality
printer mail-detail

Farewell, Dear Sirs?

247600
© Getty images
Necessary progress or an erosion of professional formality? Thomas Boyce examines two small words that have prompted a big debate

Last October, when the Law Society released its updated guidance on inclusive language, much of the debate might reasonably have centred on diversity, unconscious bias and equality in the profession. Its ‘D&Ictionary’ encourages workplaces where colleagues can bring their whole selves. It challenges ingrained bias and embeds inclusivity into everyday practice.

Yet the aspect generating the most discussion is surprisingly narrow: the recommendation to stop opening letters with the traditional greeting ‘Dear Sirs’. At first glance, it seems minor, but this phrase sits at the intersection of professional ritual, social convention and the evolution of language itself. As the Oxford English Dictionary reminds us, language is never static: it adapts to reflect societal change, with definitions and phrases falling in and out of use over time. Viewed in this light, the debate over salutations is more than a question of etiquette; it is about how law mirrors society and the values

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
back-to-top-scroll