header-logo header-logo

24 April 2026 / Thomas Boyce
Issue: 8158 / Categories: Features , Profession , Diversity , Equality
printer mail-detail

Farewell, Dear Sirs?

247600
© Getty images
Necessary progress or an erosion of professional formality? Thomas Boyce examines two small words that have prompted a big debate

Last October, when the Law Society released its updated guidance on inclusive language, much of the debate might reasonably have centred on diversity, unconscious bias and equality in the profession. Its ‘D&Ictionary’ encourages workplaces where colleagues can bring their whole selves. It challenges ingrained bias and embeds inclusivity into everyday practice.

Yet the aspect generating the most discussion is surprisingly narrow: the recommendation to stop opening letters with the traditional greeting ‘Dear Sirs’. At first glance, it seems minor, but this phrase sits at the intersection of professional ritual, social convention and the evolution of language itself. As the Oxford English Dictionary reminds us, language is never static: it adapts to reflect societal change, with definitions and phrases falling in and out of use over time. Viewed in this light, the debate over salutations is more than a question of etiquette; it is about how law mirrors society and the values

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott—Anita Rasaratnam

Clarke Willmott strengthens social housing development offering with senior London appointment

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers & Hamlins—David Meecham

Trowers strengthens Birmingham real estate team with partner hire

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan—Jennifer Ray & Louise Culleton

Blake Morgan expands private client and regulatory teams with new legal directors

NEWS
A mood of cautious optimism has enveloped the criminal law sector following indications the Prime Minister may abandon planned jury reforms
Helping to source the services and providers you need
The Senior Courts Costs Office has clarified that judges conducting detailed assessment proceedings cannot order security for costs—a ruling that may leave successful parties exposed to further litigation expense
Rejecting a generous settlement can prove an expensive mistake, as two recent high-profile cases demonstrate
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) continues to show that failing to disclose regulatory issues can attract harsher consequences than the original misconduct itself
back-to-top-scroll