header-logo header-logo

01 April 2010
Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The fast lane

A new fast-track scheme is to be introduced to give extra help to workers awarded payouts from former employers at employment tribunals to ensure they receive their payments.

A new fast-track scheme is to be introduced to give extra help to workers awarded payouts from former employers at employment tribunals to ensure they receive their payments.

The Employment Tribunal Fast Track scheme, in place from 6 April, has been created because of the high number of employers failing to pay. According to Ministry of Justice research published in May 2009, 39% of people granted awards did not receive their payments and only 53% were paid in full.

To start the fast track process, employees will pay a £50 court fee for the writ to seize assets, and this fee will be added to the debt owed by their employer. The £70.50 the high court enforcement officer would normally charge the employee if the award could not be recovered will be waived.
A public register of defaulters was introduced in April 2009 to encourage employers to pay up. Since that date, the Ministry of Justice has added the details of 570 individuals and companies.

The register, at www.trustonline.org.uk, can be searched by members of the public and credit reference firms, and contains details of defaulters who have court judgments, orders, criminal fines and now tribunal awards registered against them.

Richard Dunstan, social policy officer for Citizens Advice, which has lobbied for extra enforcement help for employees, says: “We warmly welcome this measure, which we hope will give the Employment Tribunal system the teeth it needs to ensure that rogue employers actually pay the awards made against them.

“All too often at present, a successful claim to the Tribunal proves to be a hollow victory.  That is unfair to the claimants, to the taxpayer, and to the great majority of employers who abide by the law.”

 

 

Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll