header-logo header-logo

11 January 2007
Issue: 7255 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-detail

FAT CAT THREAT

In brief

Being overweight can hinder your career progression, according to a survey of business executives. Overweight people are seen as lacking self-discipline and self-control, say 70% of those questioned in the workplace image survey by the Aziz Corporation, while 67% think they lack energy and drive. Those who are fit and exercise regularly are better able to cope with the stresses and demands of a senior role in business, say 70%. Among people who believe themselves to be overweight, 82% believe it causes prejudice at work. Almost half (44%) plan to lose weight this year, while 41% have already been on a diet in the last 12 months.

Issue: 7255 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll