header-logo header-logo

11 September 2014 / Peter Thompson KC
Issue: 7621 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Legal services
printer mail-detail

Fee remission: the new legal aid?

coverimage_0

Could fee remission mitigate the legal aid drought? Peter Thompson QC offers some tips

Denying a litigant access to a lawyer is to deny him access to justice. Every lawyer knows that. But we now have another impediment to justice that is becoming increasingly prominent—payment of the court fee. This requirement now runs across all civil litigation in the courts and also the employment tribunals. It is not chicken feed. Take claims within the small claims limit. A claimant owed £3,001 has to pay £540 for a day in court and for a claim of £5,001 the levy is £790. And the defendant with a judgment in default has to act promptly not just to apply to set it aside but also to get £155 together to pay Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunal Service.

Civil legal aid used to cover payment of the fees as part of the government-funded service. But today almost all the funding has been withdrawn for contract cases: all that remains is a litigation subsidy

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll