header-logo header-logo

Fiduciary relationships reshaped

12 September 2025 / Ceri Morgan
Issue: 8130 / Categories: Opinion , Bribery
printer mail-detail
229573
Johnson v FirstRand Bank signals a return to orthodoxy on fiduciary duties & common law bribery, writes Ceri Morgan

In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court has reshaped the landscape of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd [2025] UKSC 33.

The judgment restores orthodoxy in the law of fiduciary duties and common law bribery, while simultaneously providing a basis and benchmark for future motor finance commission claims under s 140A of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (CCA 1974).

Background

The three conjoined appeals considered the sale of motor finance to financially unsophisticated consumers buying second-hand cars. The car dealerships arranged the finance the buyers required, receiving a commission from the lenders, which was undisclosed or only partially disclosed to the consumers. The claimants alleged that these payments were unlawful, and brought proceedings against the lenders.

The Court of Appeal’s decision in October 2024 ([2024] EWCA Civ 1282), which found the lenders liable, sent shockwaves through the financial markets and sparked significant legal debate. The lenders appealed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Set creates new client and business development role amid growth

Kingsley Napley—Tim Lowles

Kingsley Napley—Tim Lowles

Sports disputes practice launchedwith partner appointment

mfg Solicitors—Tom Evans

mfg Solicitors—Tom Evans

Tax and succession planning offering expands with returning partner

NEWS
The rank of King’s Counsel (KC) has been awarded to 96 barristers, and no solicitors, in the latest silk round
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
Early determination is no longer a novelty in arbitration. In NLJ this week, Gustavo Moser, arbitration specialist lawyer at Lexis+, charts the global embrace of summary disposal powers, now embedded in the Arbitration Act 1996 and mirrored worldwide. Tribunals may swiftly dismiss claims with ‘no real prospect of succeeding’, but only if fairness is preserved
back-to-top-scroll