header-logo header-logo

06 January 2011 / Michael Salter , Chris Bryden
Issue: 7447 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

A fine balance

Chris Bryden & Michael Salter warn against the dangers of office gossip

In Nixon v Ross Coates Solicitors [2010] UKEAT/0108/10/ZT HHJ McMullen with typical robustness noted the “injudicious behaviour by young professionals at the Christmas party of a solicitor’s firm and its consequences for employment relations”.

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) was considering an appeal by the claimant, Miss Nixon, and a cross-appeal by the respondent, arising out of Miss Nixon’s claim for unfair dismissal, sex discrimination, and discrimination on the grounds of pregnancy and harassment.

The claim arose out of the pregnancy of Miss Nixon by a colleague in the firm, Mr Perrin, with whom she was in a relationship. At a staff Christmas party held on 22 December 2007, however, Miss Nixon was, in the words of HHJ McMullen, “involved flirtatiously [in] kissing the IT manager”; the pair later obtained a room and had intercourse. In the New Year, Miss Nixon informed the principal of the firm, Mr Coates, of the fact of her pregnancy. However, within an hour the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll