header-logo header-logo

05 January 2012 / Amanda Hamilton
Issue: 7495 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

A fine distinction

Amanda Hamilton takes the stand in the paralegal definition debate

The term “paralegal” is used in most jurisdictions to describe a professional who assists qualified lawyers in their legal work. This is certainly the case in the US. However, in England and Wales the profession has yet to agree a definition of a “paralegal” and thus much confusion has existed in this area for many years.

The term “paralegal” was first introduced into the UK by the National Association of Licensed Paralegals (NALP) in 1987. It defines paralegals as a person qualified through education and training to perform substantive legal work, who requires knowledge of the law and procedures, and who is not a qualified solicitor, barrister or legal executive.

Professionals in their own right?

To add to the confusion, there are several types of paralegals who are defined more from the way they work rather than particular practice areas or levels of expertise.

NALP has, for 24 years, recognised paralegals as professionals in their own right, with many working as freelancers

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll