header-logo header-logo

05 January 2012 / Amanda Hamilton
Issue: 7495 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

A fine distinction

Amanda Hamilton takes the stand in the paralegal definition debate

The term “paralegal” is used in most jurisdictions to describe a professional who assists qualified lawyers in their legal work. This is certainly the case in the US. However, in England and Wales the profession has yet to agree a definition of a “paralegal” and thus much confusion has existed in this area for many years.

The term “paralegal” was first introduced into the UK by the National Association of Licensed Paralegals (NALP) in 1987. It defines paralegals as a person qualified through education and training to perform substantive legal work, who requires knowledge of the law and procedures, and who is not a qualified solicitor, barrister or legal executive.

Professionals in their own right?

To add to the confusion, there are several types of paralegals who are defined more from the way they work rather than particular practice areas or levels of expertise.

NALP has, for 24 years, recognised paralegals as professionals in their own right, with many working as freelancers

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll