header-logo header-logo

05 January 2012 / Amanda Hamilton
Issue: 7495 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

A fine distinction

Amanda Hamilton takes the stand in the paralegal definition debate

The term “paralegal” is used in most jurisdictions to describe a professional who assists qualified lawyers in their legal work. This is certainly the case in the US. However, in England and Wales the profession has yet to agree a definition of a “paralegal” and thus much confusion has existed in this area for many years.

The term “paralegal” was first introduced into the UK by the National Association of Licensed Paralegals (NALP) in 1987. It defines paralegals as a person qualified through education and training to perform substantive legal work, who requires knowledge of the law and procedures, and who is not a qualified solicitor, barrister or legal executive.

Professionals in their own right?

To add to the confusion, there are several types of paralegals who are defined more from the way they work rather than particular practice areas or levels of expertise.

NALP has, for 24 years, recognised paralegals as professionals in their own right, with many working as freelancers

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll