header-logo header-logo

Firearms offences: eight new sentencing guidelines published

09 December 2020
Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail
Sentencing Council sets out framework for possession, manufacture & sale of illegal weapons

Judges and magistrates in England and Wales will be provided with eight new guidelines for sentencing those convicted of firearms offences from 1 January 2021, following a consultation by the Sentencing Council. 

Currently, there are no sentencing guidelines for firearms offences in the Crown Court, and just one in magistrates’ courts, covering the offence of carrying a firearm in a public place. The new guidelines set out the sentencing practice for eight offences under the Firearms Act 1968, including the possession, purchase or acquisition of an unlawful weapon or ammunition, possession of a firearm with the intent to endanger life or cause fear of violence, and the manufacture, transfer or sale of a prohibited weapon or ammunition.

Once the new guidelines come into force on 1 January, it is hoped they will provide the courts with a consistent framework for sentencing such offences. In preparation for the new guidelines, the Sentencing Council also analysed potential disparities in sentencing outcomes for some firearms offences based on the offender’s ethnicity, and have included measures in the new guidelines to flag evidence of sentencing disparities for the sentencer’s attention.

Sentencing Council member Mrs Justice Maura McGowan said: ‘Firearms have the potential to cause terrible harm—from severe injury or death to intense fear—and the courts rightly take these offences extremely seriously. We know that judges and magistrates will welcome guidelines in this difficult area of sentencing.

‘The new guidelines cover a range of offending relating to the possession, manufacturing and transferring of firearms and aim to provide a structured framework for courts to ensure a consistent approach to sentencing that meets the seriousness of the offending.'

Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

London firm announces acquisition of corporate team

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Head of corporate appointed following Teesside merger

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Firm expands into banking and finance sector with newly appointed head of banking

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll