header-logo header-logo

09 December 2020
Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Firearms offences: eight new sentencing guidelines published

Sentencing Council sets out framework for possession, manufacture & sale of illegal weapons

Judges and magistrates in England and Wales will be provided with eight new guidelines for sentencing those convicted of firearms offences from 1 January 2021, following a consultation by the Sentencing Council. 

Currently, there are no sentencing guidelines for firearms offences in the Crown Court, and just one in magistrates’ courts, covering the offence of carrying a firearm in a public place. The new guidelines set out the sentencing practice for eight offences under the Firearms Act 1968, including the possession, purchase or acquisition of an unlawful weapon or ammunition, possession of a firearm with the intent to endanger life or cause fear of violence, and the manufacture, transfer or sale of a prohibited weapon or ammunition.

Once the new guidelines come into force on 1 January, it is hoped they will provide the courts with a consistent framework for sentencing such offences. In preparation for the new guidelines, the Sentencing Council also analysed potential disparities in sentencing outcomes for some firearms offences based on the offender’s ethnicity, and have included measures in the new guidelines to flag evidence of sentencing disparities for the sentencer’s attention.

Sentencing Council member Mrs Justice Maura McGowan said: ‘Firearms have the potential to cause terrible harm—from severe injury or death to intense fear—and the courts rightly take these offences extremely seriously. We know that judges and magistrates will welcome guidelines in this difficult area of sentencing.

‘The new guidelines cover a range of offending relating to the possession, manufacturing and transferring of firearms and aim to provide a structured framework for courts to ensure a consistent approach to sentencing that meets the seriousness of the offending.'

Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll