header-logo header-logo

29 April 2010
Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Firms resist pressure to outsource

Many firms opting for self regulation & management of risk
Few UK law firms are outsourcing work despite client pressure to reduce cost, according to the annual Legal Risk survey on professional indemnity and risk management.

Among the top 100 firms contacted in the seventh annual survey, only four per cent are outsourcing legal process and 2% are outsourcing advice.

Nearly a tenth of firms changed broker this year, with the same number changing insurer. Marsh is the most popular broker, attracting a third of the market. A quarter of law firms chose Aon, and 19% chose Lockton. Among insurers, Travelers rules the roost with 32% of top 100 firms, QBE is in second place with 17.5% (down from 22% of the market last year) and Libra has 16%. Only seven per cent of firms increased their cover this year. Half of the firms surveyed allocate responsibility for risk management to a partner, while a third rely on a risk management specialist. 60% of firms have audit committees.

One in five of the top 100, and 45% of the top 30, firms have “lifeboat”—or asset protection—policies to protect the personal liabilities of members of limited liability partnerships. Conversion to limited liability status has taken place at 86% of the top 100 firms, with a further four per cent planning to convert in the next 12 months. Legal Risk partner, Frank Maher says: “This year’s survey shows that firms are at the beginning of the cycle of immense change being heralded by the Legal Services Act, new forms of regulation and client pressures for cost cutting through outsourcing. On a positive note the pressures on costs and reduced staff numbers have not impacted on the size of risk and compliance teams, perhaps influenced by the large number of Top 100 firms who may want to follow the self-regulation model recommended by Lord Hunt.”
 

Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll