header-logo header-logo

14 October 2009
Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Firms suffer in hostile insurance market

SRA rules out premium reduction for assigned risks pool

The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has ruled out any possibility of reducing assigned risks pool (ARP) insurance premiums, despite large numbers of firms having had no option but to join the pool.

Some 342 firms are now in the ARP, where they pay 27.5% of their turnover to the Law Society, after failing to secure indemnity insurance premiums on the open market. However, according to the SRA, this number “changes virtually by the hour”.

As reported in NLJ earlier this month, many firms struggled to renew in a hostile insurance market leading up to the 1 October deadline, and premiums soared by up to 300% amid rising professional negligence claims. Legal Risk partner, Frank Maher, who has been advising firms in difficulty, said many firms were having “enormous trouble” (see www.newlawjournal.co.uk: “D-day casualties expected”).

In September, the Law Society wrote to the SRA to ask if premiums could be reduced. However, an SRA spokesman said a reduction was impossible: “The ARP premium rates for the indemnity year which began at the start of this month were fixed many months ago.

“They are contained in rules made under statute and in a set of contracts made earlier this year. It is not realistically possible now to change those rates. To do so would entail both retrospective rule making and the consent of numerous contracting parties to change, to their disadvantage, existing contracts.

“Solicitors who have not yet obtained market cover can still do so. If market cover is obtained before the end of November, and if the insurer agrees, insurance can be backdated to 1 October, thus enabling such firms to leave the ARP. If a firm is able to secure cover in the market but with an inception date after 1 October 2009, then the firm will need to effect an ARP policy for the period from 1 October 2009 to the inception of the market policy.

In those circumstances the ARP would adjust the premium in accordance with the rules, and the firm could also apply to the SRA for a waiver to further reduce the ARP short period premium.”

Finance company Syscap says it has received record requests for funding from law firms, including for loans of up to £5m.

A list of brokers and insurers can be viewed online at www.sra.org.uk/indemnity.

The Law Society has set up a professional indemnity helpline. Concerned solicitors can phone 020 7320 9545 or e-mail PII@lawsociety.org.uk.

Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll