header-logo header-logo

Fixed penalty notices: blurring the lines?

03 June 2022 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7981 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law , Criminal , Public
printer mail-detail
83592
Neil Parpworth reports on fixed penalty notices for COVID offences: have they muddied the waters between civil & criminal penalties?
  • When defending Boris Johnson after he received a fixed penalty notice (FPN) for breaking COVID restrictions, some suggested that such civil penalties, once paid, eliminate the possibility of future prosecution in the criminal courts, and do not represent an admission of guilt.
  • There are inherent difficulties with a scheme which enables criminal conduct to go unpunished by the courts, while at the same time permitting a suspect to contend that paying a FPN was borne of their desire to put the matter behind them, rather than because they genuinely accept that they have done anything wrong..

After Parliament reconvened following the Easter recess, the prime minister Boris Johnson made a statement to the House of Commons in which he sought to update it on events which had been occurring both home and abroad. While there was much mention of Ukraine, the prime minister also sought to explain ‘in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll