Fixed penalty notices: blurring the lines?

Neil Parpworth reports on fixed penalty notices for COVID offences: have they muddied the waters between civil & criminal penalties?

When defending Boris Johnson after he received a fixed penalty notice (FPN) for breaking COVID restrictions, some suggested that such civil penalties, once paid, eliminate the possibility of future prosecution in the criminal courts, and do not represent an admission of guilt.
There are inherent difficulties with a scheme which enables criminal conduct to go unpunished by the courts, while at the same time permitting a suspect to contend that paying a FPN was borne of their desire to put the matter behind them, rather than because they genuinely accept that they have done anything wrong..

After Parliament reconvened following the Easter recess, the prime minister Boris Johnson made a statement to the House of Commons in which he sought to update it on events which had been occurring both home and abroad. While there was much mention of Ukraine, the prime minister also sought to explain ‘in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Fixed penalty notices: blurring the lines?

Issue: 7981 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law , Criminal , Public

Neil Parpworth reports on fixed penalty notices for COVID offences: have they muddied the waters between civil & criminal penalties?

When defending Boris Johnson after he received a fixed penalty notice (FPN) for breaking COVID restrictions, some suggested that such civil penalties, once paid, eliminate the possibility of future prosecution in the criminal courts, and do not represent an admission of guilt.
There are inherent difficulties with a scheme which enables criminal conduct to go unpunished by the courts, while at the same time permitting a suspect to contend that paying a FPN was borne of their desire to put the matter behind them, rather than because they genuinely accept that they have done anything wrong..

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

Gibson Dunn—Richard Surtees

Gibson Dunn adds employee benefits and executive compensation practice in London with partner Richard Surtees

Laytons ETL—Alec Cameron

Laytons ETL appoints new partner and head of intellectual property disputes

Muckle LLP—Roland Fairlamb

Specialist associate solicitor rejoins Muckle’s leading employment team

NEWS

Read All

NLJ this week: Property cases reshape established principles

A series of recent decisions has clarified important principles across property law, from perpetuities to lease renewals and public rights over land

NLJ this week: Stress ruling raises the bar for employers

Employers cannot rely on wellbeing services alone to defend workplace stress claims after a High Court decision awarding almost £1m to an overworked employee

NLJ this week: Can Manchesterism revive access to justice?

Andy Burnham's brand of 'Manchesterism' could offer fresh thinking on legal aid and access to justice if it reaches Westminster, according to Roger Smith, NLJ columnist and former director of JUSTICE

NLJ this week: Constitutional conventions tested as power changes hands

The constitutional fallout from a change of prime minister, rather than the politics, is under scrutiny as questions arise over the limits of executive authority in a leadership transition

NLJ this week: Lawyers must become product designers

The legal profession is undergoing a fundamental shift from selling services to creating technology-enabled products, according to Professor Luke Mason, Head of School of Law at Regent's University London

Error message

Fixed penalty notices: blurring the lines?

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gibson Dunn—Richard Surtees

Laytons ETL—Alec Cameron

Muckle LLP—Roland Fairlamb