header-logo header-logo

Fixed penalty notices: blurring the lines?

03 June 2022 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7981 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law , Criminal , Public
printer mail-detail
83592
Neil Parpworth reports on fixed penalty notices for COVID offences: have they muddied the waters between civil & criminal penalties?
  • When defending Boris Johnson after he received a fixed penalty notice (FPN) for breaking COVID restrictions, some suggested that such civil penalties, once paid, eliminate the possibility of future prosecution in the criminal courts, and do not represent an admission of guilt.
  • There are inherent difficulties with a scheme which enables criminal conduct to go unpunished by the courts, while at the same time permitting a suspect to contend that paying a FPN was borne of their desire to put the matter behind them, rather than because they genuinely accept that they have done anything wrong..

After Parliament reconvened following the Easter recess, the prime minister Boris Johnson made a statement to the House of Commons in which he sought to update it on events which had been occurring both home and abroad. While there was much mention of Ukraine, the prime minister also sought to explain ‘in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll