header-logo header-logo

03 June 2022 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7981 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law , Criminal , Public
printer mail-detail

Fixed penalty notices: blurring the lines?

83592
Neil Parpworth reports on fixed penalty notices for COVID offences: have they muddied the waters between civil & criminal penalties?
  • When defending Boris Johnson after he received a fixed penalty notice (FPN) for breaking COVID restrictions, some suggested that such civil penalties, once paid, eliminate the possibility of future prosecution in the criminal courts, and do not represent an admission of guilt.
  • There are inherent difficulties with a scheme which enables criminal conduct to go unpunished by the courts, while at the same time permitting a suspect to contend that paying a FPN was borne of their desire to put the matter behind them, rather than because they genuinely accept that they have done anything wrong..

After Parliament reconvened following the Easter recess, the prime minister Boris Johnson made a statement to the House of Commons in which he sought to update it on events which had been occurring both home and abroad. While there was much mention of Ukraine, the prime minister also sought to explain ‘in

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll