header-logo header-logo

19 November 2009 / Dan Mccauley
Issue: 7394 / Categories: Features , Personal injury , Employment
printer mail-detail

Flying high

A commonsense approach is plane obvious, says Dan McCauley

Accidents at work can often lead to hefty compensation claims and in high-profile cases, the damage to an employer’s reputation is often difficult to recover from. However, away from the headlines many courts are taking a commonsense approach to claims for damages following accidents in the workplace. 

Claims for injuries occurring while an employee is at work can also adversely affect businesses through a loss output, damage to their reputation and increasing insurance rates, all before the case is even heard in court. But as a recent case demonstrates, defendant employers should not always have to worry that the courts will hold them liable for injuries caused in these kinds of accidents so long as they have implemented the relevant health and safety procedures correctly.

In Hough v Monarch Airlines Limited,  the claimant was employed by the defendant airline as a cabin purser. Her duties during the course of a flight included, amongst other things, supplying passengers with DVD digi players and these were dispensed by means

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll