Forecourt finance: what’s next?

23 May 2025 / Ceri Morgan

Issue: 8117 / Categories: Features , Company , Liability , Financial services litigation , Consumer , Constitutional law

Ceri Morgan analyses the response to lender liability in motor finance broker commission cases

In Hopcraft, the Court of Appeal found lenders liable for undisclosed commissions paid to secondhand car dealers arranging finance for their customers.
The decision was appealed to the Supreme Court, with the Financial Conduct Authority intervening to express concerns that the Court of Appeal’s approach went ‘too far’.
The article explores the market response to the Court of Appeal’s decision, the current state of the law in terms of the duties owed by motor dealer brokers, and the potential impact on the separation of powers debate.

The Court of Appeal’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd (London Branch) (t/a MotoNovo Finance) [2024] EWCA Civ 1282 (Hopcraft) has sparked significant debate within the legal and financial sectors. The ruling, which has since been appealed to the Supreme Court, found lenders liable for undisclosed (or only partially disclosed) commissions paid to secondhand car dealers who were also arranging the finance for their customers.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Forecourt finance: what’s next?

Ceri Morgan analyses the response to lender liability in motor finance broker commission cases

In Hopcraft, the Court of Appeal found lenders liable for undisclosed commissions paid to secondhand car dealers arranging finance for their customers.
The decision was appealed to the Supreme Court, with the Financial Conduct Authority intervening to express concerns that the Court of Appeal’s approach went ‘too far’.
The article explores the market response to the Court of Appeal’s decision, the current state of the law in terms of the duties owed by motor dealer brokers, and the potential impact on the separation of powers debate.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

Muckle LLP—Rachael Chapman

Sports, education and charities practice welcomes senior associate

Ellisons—Carla Jones

Partner and head of commercial litigation joins in Chelmsford

Freeths—Louise Mahon

Firm strengthens Glasgow corporate practice with partner hire

NEWS

Read All

Stress at work for corporate counsel

One in five in-house lawyers suffer ‘high’ or ‘severe’ work-related stress, according to a report by global legal body, the Association of Corporate Counsel (ACC)

Chancery Lane says no to LeO

The Legal Ombudsman’s (LeO’s) plea for a budget increase has been rejected by the Law Society and accepted only ‘with reluctance’ by conveyancers

Human rights concerns for patients, prisoners & immigration detainees

Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned

Licensing fast-track for conveyancing & probate professionals

Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals

Stress at work? Join the (employment tribunal claim) queue

Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace

Error message

Forecourt finance: what’s next?

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Rachael Chapman

Ellisons—Carla Jones

Freeths—Louise Mahon