header-logo header-logo

The fraud litigation spiral

05 February 2009 / Simon Taylor , Andrew Mitchell KC
Issue: 7355 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

An economy in decline means increased fraud detection say Andrew Mitchell QC & Simon Taylor

In our current dire economic circumstances, the usual diet of commercial lawyers—high levels of transactional work, property deals, mergers and acquisitions—are seeing a downturn in the level and quality of the work undertaken. Equally, because of the strained finances of clients, fee levels tend to be lower than at other times.

There is, however, one area of the law where practitioners tend to experience work levels that are counter-cyclical. In fraud and asset recovery litigation, the experience is that work levels rise during periods of economic downturn. The reasons for this are largely self-explanatory: as business or individuals “go to the wall” or approach that point, attention necessarily is focussed on the reason for the failure. Creditors, and others having an interest in a business or an individual, will wish to know the reasons why it is that they cannot or may not be able to recover their money.

This interest is all the more

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll