header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Freedom of information—Exempt information—Attorney general's certificate

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
24 July 2013
Issue: 7570 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of Evans) v Attorney General [2013] EWHC 1960 (Admin), [2013] All ER (D) 111 (Jul)

Queen's Bench Division, Divisional Court, Lord Judge LCJ, Davis LJ and Globe J, 9 July 2013

The attorney general's power to issue a certificate under s 53 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA 2000), with the practical effect of preventing disclosure ordered by the Upper Tribunal is not unconstitutional; reasons have to be provided and will be available to scrutiny on judicial review. The certificate issued precluding disclosure of letters of the Prince of Wales was not unreasonable and thus would not be overturned.

Dinah Rose QC & Aidan Eardley (instructed by Guardian News and Media Ltd) for the claimant. Jonathan Swift QC & Julian Milford (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Attorney General. Timothy Pitt-Payne QC (instructed by the Information Commissioner's Office) for the Information Commissioner.

The claimant was a journalist. In April 2005, he sought disclosure of communications passing between

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Big tech for small firms
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
NLJ this week: Presumption of capacity reaffirmed
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
NLJ this week: Justice delayed, justice denied
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
NLJ this week: The road ahead for employment rights
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: SLAPPed shut?
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll