header-logo header-logo

31 July 2009
Issue: 7380 / Categories: Legal News , Freedom of Information , Other practice areas
printer mail-detail

Freedom of information extension limited

Housing associations, independent schools and other charities are to be excluded from the extension of the freedom of information regime.

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) had been expected to add these organisations to the list of public authorities covered directly by the Freedom of Information Act 2000, following a consultation a year ago.

However, it announced this month that they would be excluded, on the basis the burden imposed on them would outweigh the benefits. Tom Morrison, associate at Rollits, says: “There has been a growing feeling among public authorities—and some MPs—that the public’s right of access to information is becoming increasingly inconvenient. Entire administrative structures have had to be put in place solely to deal with information requests since the Act came into force in 2005.”

According to the MoJ, 21% of “resolvable” requests for information under the FOIA were withheld in 2008, compared with 18% in 2005 when the Act came into force.
 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll