header-logo header-logo

Freedom of expression: what’s acceptable?

04 August 2023 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 8036 / Categories: Features , Discrimination , Human rights , Employment
printer mail-detail
132779
Where is the line between the right to freedom of religion & the lawful expression of that right? Nicholas Dobson examines a complex question for the Employment Appeal Tribunal
  • When considering the lawfulness of the expression of the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion, it is necessary to determine whether any interference with those rights was in respect of the manifestation of the claimant’s protected belief, or rather was due to a justified objection to the manner of that manifestation.

Those having higher mileage on their personal odometers will have lived through profound social changes. For example, people in same-sex relationships (or suspected of having same-sex orientation) were, until relatively recently, subject to considerable social stigma—and sometimes violent abuse. For same-sex relationships were legalised only with the passing of the Sexual Offences Act on 26 July 1967, and then only between two consenting adults over the age of 21 and in private. Wide social acceptance of such stigmas was supported, particularly among practising Christians, by Bible teaching

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll