header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
20 January 2017 / Chris Syder
Issue: 7730 / Categories: Features , Human rights , Employment
printer mail-detail

Freedom pass

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
nlj_7730_syder

Chris Syder & Eva Camus-Smith follow the fight against Modern Slavery

  • ​UK government introduces new Modern Slavery taskforce.

  • 40% increase in referrals of potential victims.

  • Business lip service risks far more onerous legislation.

It should come as no surprise that the crimes of Modern Slavery remain a high priority for the UK government: it was Theresa May, as Home Secretary, who brought into effect the Modern Slavery Act 2015 (MSA 2015).

MSA 2015 itself provides UK law enforcement with significant powers of prosecution. An individual found guilty of holding another in slavery or human trafficking may be sentenced to life imprisonment. During 2016 we saw not only how the provisions of MSA 2015 will be enforced against UK businesses but also the negative PR created for larger businesses within the perpetrator’s supply chain. For instance, Lithuanian migrants who were trafficked to work in UK farms producing eggs are suing a Kent-based gangmaster operation (DJ Houghton) and its directors. The migrants were working in supply chains producing premium free range eggs for McDonald’s, Tesco, Asda,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Gibson Dunn—Richard Surtees

Gibson Dunn—Richard Surtees

Gibson Dunn adds employee benefits and executive compensation practice in London with partner Richard Surtees

Laytons ETL—Alec Cameron

Laytons ETL—Alec Cameron

Laytons ETL appoints new partner and head of intellectual property disputes

Muckle LLP—Roland Fairlamb

Muckle LLP—Roland Fairlamb

Specialist associate solicitor rejoins Muckle’s leading employment team

NEWS
Read All
Good faith test is objective, rules Supreme Court
The Supreme Court has clarified the scope of a director’s duty, in a case where a chairman’s good intentions went awry due to the pandemic
Fisher review urges tough action on digital fraud
Digital fraud is ‘baffling policymakers, investigators, prosecutors and enforcers’, leaving ‘a massive justice gap’, the author of a government-commissioned independent review has warned
Regulatory overseer must do better
Richard Lloyd’s independent review of the Legal Services Board (LSB) has delivered a devastating verdict, accusing the super-regulator of having ‘lost its way in recent years’
Hillsborough Law imposes duty of candour
The House of Commons has passed the Hillsborough Law, in a historic achievement for campaigners, survivors and families of those who died in the 1989 stadium collapse
Judging statistics show mixed bag on diversity progress
Judicial statistics show a steady rise in the number of female judges and Asian and mixed ethnicity judges in the past ten years—however, progress in terms of representation has stalled for both Black lawyers and for solicitors
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll