header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Freedom pass

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
20 January 2017 / Chris Syder
Issue: 7730 / Categories: Features , Human rights , Employment
printer mail-detail
nlj_7730_syder

Chris Syder & Eva Camus-Smith follow the fight against Modern Slavery

  • ​UK government introduces new Modern Slavery taskforce.

  • 40% increase in referrals of potential victims.

  • Business lip service risks far more onerous legislation.

It should come as no surprise that the crimes of Modern Slavery remain a high priority for the UK government: it was Theresa May, as Home Secretary, who brought into effect the Modern Slavery Act 2015 (MSA 2015).

MSA 2015 itself provides UK law enforcement with significant powers of prosecution. An individual found guilty of holding another in slavery or human trafficking may be sentenced to life imprisonment. During 2016 we saw not only how the provisions of MSA 2015 will be enforced against UK businesses but also the negative PR created for larger businesses within the perpetrator’s supply chain. For instance, Lithuanian migrants who were trafficked to work in UK farms producing eggs are suing a Kent-based gangmaster operation (DJ Houghton) and its directors. The migrants were working in supply chains producing premium free range eggs for McDonald’s, Tesco, Asda,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Read All
Public Accounts Committee warn of ‘extinction’ risk for legal aid
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
NLJ this week: The insider returns
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
NLJ this week: Drawing the line on contempt
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
NLJ this week: Stop and search by the numbers
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
NLJ this week: Looking back on the prorogation that never was
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll