header-logo header-logo

18 October 2013 / Peter Causton
Issue: 7580 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

A fresh approach

istock_000022505621medium

 Peter Causton casts an eye over recent plans to modernise the Chancery Division

When Briggs LJ turned his attention to the modernisation of the Chancery Division, he faced a mammoth task and this is reflected in his 162-page Chancery Modernisation Review: Provisional Report.

It is apparent from the report that the decision-making in the Division is held in high regard and that there is no requirement for radical reform, so the focus is upon cultural change. No discussion of the Division can be complete without mentioning Dickens’ Bleak House, which some might consider to be the first review of the Division. Briggs LJ reports that there was no hint of the old Bleak House criticism in the consultation responses, but there are problems which do need addressing. He identifies long delays in obtaining hearings before registrars and criticises the lack of modern IT. Judges have no electronic diaries and there is no electronic filing system. There are unacceptable delays in drawing up orders and an absence of effective means of communication

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll