header-logo header-logo

19 July 2007
Issue: 7282 / Categories: Legal News , Tribunals , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-detail

Freshfields defends age discrimination claims

News

City law firm Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer—which is currently defending an age discrimination claim at an employment tribunal—is reportedly facing another claim from another disgruntled former partner.

According to newspaper reports, Lois Moore, a mergers and acquisitions partner who left Freshfields last year, is also suing the firm for age discrimination over changes made to the firm’s pension scheme. Her case has been deferred by the tribunal pending the outcome of the current case, brought by Peter Bloxham.

Bloxham, former head of insolvency at Freshfields, alleges that changes made to the firm’s pension arrangements for retired partners amounted to direct and indirect discrimination against older partners. He claims he was forced to retire early and take a cut in his pension.
Freshfields has already paid £24m in severance payments to 25 former partners, but Bloxham is claiming a further £4.5m compensation under the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006, which came into force last October.

The employment tribunal was told that the reason Freshfields changed its pensions system—where current partners pay for retired partners’ pensions—was to alter the “size and shape” of the partnership by weeding out older partners.

Freshfields, however, says the pension reforms were a necessary compromise to fix an “extraordinarily difficult issue”.
Dinah Rose QC, who is acting as counsel for Freshfields, points out that several partners in a similar position to Bloxham voted in favour of the reforms.

Issue: 7282 / Categories: Legal News , Tribunals , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll