header-logo header-logo

Freshfields defends age discrimination claims

19 July 2007
Issue: 7282 / Categories: Legal News , Tribunals , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-detail

News

City law firm Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer—which is currently defending an age discrimination claim at an employment tribunal—is reportedly facing another claim from another disgruntled former partner.

According to newspaper reports, Lois Moore, a mergers and acquisitions partner who left Freshfields last year, is also suing the firm for age discrimination over changes made to the firm’s pension scheme. Her case has been deferred by the tribunal pending the outcome of the current case, brought by Peter Bloxham.

Bloxham, former head of insolvency at Freshfields, alleges that changes made to the firm’s pension arrangements for retired partners amounted to direct and indirect discrimination against older partners. He claims he was forced to retire early and take a cut in his pension.
Freshfields has already paid £24m in severance payments to 25 former partners, but Bloxham is claiming a further £4.5m compensation under the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006, which came into force last October.

The employment tribunal was told that the reason Freshfields changed its pensions system—where current partners pay for retired partners’ pensions—was to alter the “size and shape” of the partnership by weeding out older partners.

Freshfields, however, says the pension reforms were a necessary compromise to fix an “extraordinarily difficult issue”.
Dinah Rose QC, who is acting as counsel for Freshfields, points out that several partners in a similar position to Bloxham voted in favour of the reforms.

Issue: 7282 / Categories: Legal News , Tribunals , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll