header-logo header-logo

08 February 2007
Issue: 7259 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-detail

Freshfields faces age discrimination claim

News

A former Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer partner is suing the City law firm for age discrimination over pension cuts in one of the first cases of its kind since new rules were introduced in October last year.

Peter Bloxham, 54, the City giant’s former head of insolvency, filed the claim at a London employment tribunal. He was one of about 30 lawyers who chose to retire from Freshfields’ partnership on a full pension last year, instead of staying on and falling victim to swingeing cuts in retirement benefits.

From last May, partners were to receive a maximum of £153,000 a year in retirement—as much as 40% les than under Freshfields’ previous plan. About one-third of partners eligible for early retirement decided to leave when the changes were announced.

Ronnie Fox, principal of FOX, says retirement of partners has become a minefield for law firms.
“Firms can no longer require partners to retire against their wish simply on the grounds of age unless this can be justified objectively. This is a real area of uncertainty and law firms have difficult choices to make,” he adds.

Issue: 7259 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

Bird & Bird—Gordon Moir

Bird & Bird—Gordon Moir

London tech and comms team boosted by telecoms and regulatory hires

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll