header-logo header-logo

18 February 2026
Issue: 8150 / Categories: Legal News , Collective action , Judicial review , Litigation funding
printer mail-detail

Funder challenge to Mastercard settlement given green light

Litigation funder Innsworth Capital, which funded behemoth opt-out action Merricks v Mastercard, can bring a judicial review, the High Court ruled last week

Innsworth is challenging the Competition Appeal Tribunal’s decision to approve a £200m settlement between class representative Walter Merricks and Mastercard, which was initially valued at £14bn. It argues it deserves more than the £68m it received from the settlement.

Jeremy Marshall, chief investment officer of Winward Litigation Finance, said the decision was ‘positive for the litigation funding industry and the UK’s opt-out regime as a whole.

‘The judicial review will also provide much needed transparency with regards to the tribunal’s approach to what it considers to be an appropriate return for litigation funders, who invest tens of millions of pounds on a non-recourse basis for many years in cases that aim to secure damages from companies that often have been found by regulators to have broken the law.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll