header-logo header-logo

The future for conveyancing

15 November 2016
Issue: 7723 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Buyers would make a legal commitment when they offered on a property while a secure online portal would hold information on behalf of all parties involved, under the Conveyancing Association’s vision for the future.

In a white paper published this week, Modernising the Home Moving Process, the Association highlights the benefit of greater certainty earlier in the home moving process. It suggests this can be achieved by centralising the identity verification of the parties to reduce the risk of fraud and money laundering, collating the property information and title information on the marketing of a property, and requiring a legal commitment on offer to reduce transaction failures.

It proposes requiring completion monies to be sent through the day before completion, amending the Commonhold & Leasehold Reform Act 2002 to reduce delays in the leasehold sales process, and providing a reliable lending decision-in-principle based on a “hard” credit report without impacting on the applicant’s credit score.

A secure online portal would hold all communications between the parties and their agents, protecting them from potential fraud and enabling parties to update and amend information quickly.

Eddie Goldsmith, the Association’s Chairman and partner at Goldsmith Williams, said conveyancing times between offer and completion have steadily increased from eight weeks to 13 weeks, and even longer for leasehold transactions.

“We freely admit there is a huge ambition to much of the white paper, particularly around the need for greater digitisation and a joined-up technology hub through which all aspects of the process are accessed,” he said.

“However, there are also a number of potential ‘quick win’ solutions identified within the paper which, with the right head wind, could be achieved.”

Peter Ambrose, director of property solicitors The Partnership, said: “Most of the white paper’s recommendations are entirely feasible.

“In fact, we have already adopted many of them through centralised data provision.”

 

Issue: 7723 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll