header-logo header-logo

The future for conveyancing

15 November 2016
Issue: 7723 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Buyers would make a legal commitment when they offered on a property while a secure online portal would hold information on behalf of all parties involved, under the Conveyancing Association’s vision for the future.

In a white paper published this week, Modernising the Home Moving Process, the Association highlights the benefit of greater certainty earlier in the home moving process. It suggests this can be achieved by centralising the identity verification of the parties to reduce the risk of fraud and money laundering, collating the property information and title information on the marketing of a property, and requiring a legal commitment on offer to reduce transaction failures.

It proposes requiring completion monies to be sent through the day before completion, amending the Commonhold & Leasehold Reform Act 2002 to reduce delays in the leasehold sales process, and providing a reliable lending decision-in-principle based on a “hard” credit report without impacting on the applicant’s credit score.

A secure online portal would hold all communications between the parties and their agents, protecting them from potential fraud and enabling parties to update and amend information quickly.

Eddie Goldsmith, the Association’s Chairman and partner at Goldsmith Williams, said conveyancing times between offer and completion have steadily increased from eight weeks to 13 weeks, and even longer for leasehold transactions.

“We freely admit there is a huge ambition to much of the white paper, particularly around the need for greater digitisation and a joined-up technology hub through which all aspects of the process are accessed,” he said.

“However, there are also a number of potential ‘quick win’ solutions identified within the paper which, with the right head wind, could be achieved.”

Peter Ambrose, director of property solicitors The Partnership, said: “Most of the white paper’s recommendations are entirely feasible.

“In fact, we have already adopted many of them through centralised data provision.”

 

Issue: 7723 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll