header-logo header-logo

The future for conveyancing

15 November 2016
Issue: 7723 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Buyers would make a legal commitment when they offered on a property while a secure online portal would hold information on behalf of all parties involved, under the Conveyancing Association’s vision for the future.

In a white paper published this week, Modernising the Home Moving Process, the Association highlights the benefit of greater certainty earlier in the home moving process. It suggests this can be achieved by centralising the identity verification of the parties to reduce the risk of fraud and money laundering, collating the property information and title information on the marketing of a property, and requiring a legal commitment on offer to reduce transaction failures.

It proposes requiring completion monies to be sent through the day before completion, amending the Commonhold & Leasehold Reform Act 2002 to reduce delays in the leasehold sales process, and providing a reliable lending decision-in-principle based on a “hard” credit report without impacting on the applicant’s credit score.

A secure online portal would hold all communications between the parties and their agents, protecting them from potential fraud and enabling parties to update and amend information quickly.

Eddie Goldsmith, the Association’s Chairman and partner at Goldsmith Williams, said conveyancing times between offer and completion have steadily increased from eight weeks to 13 weeks, and even longer for leasehold transactions.

“We freely admit there is a huge ambition to much of the white paper, particularly around the need for greater digitisation and a joined-up technology hub through which all aspects of the process are accessed,” he said.

“However, there are also a number of potential ‘quick win’ solutions identified within the paper which, with the right head wind, could be achieved.”

Peter Ambrose, director of property solicitors The Partnership, said: “Most of the white paper’s recommendations are entirely feasible.

“In fact, we have already adopted many of them through centralised data provision.”

 

Issue: 7723 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Burges Salmon—Lillian Mackenzie

Burges Salmon—Lillian Mackenzie

Projects and infrastructure team appoints partner in Edinburgh

Gateley Legal—Brian Dowling

Gateley Legal—Brian Dowling

Partner joins residential development team in Reading

DWF—Don Brown

DWF—Don Brown

Banking and finance team expands with strategic partner hire

NEWS
In July, the Supreme Court quashed the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, ruling that trial judges had wrongly directed juries to treat profit-motivated Libor submissions as inherently dishonest. In this week’s NLJ, David Stern and James Fletcher of 5 St Andrew’s Hill reflect on the decision
Lord Neuberger, former president of the Supreme Court, shares his views on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill in this week's NLJ with William Raven
In this week's issue of NLJ, Emma Brunning and Dharshica Thanarajasingham of Birketts unpack the high-conflict financial remedy case TF v SF [2025] EWHC 1659 (Fam). The husband’s conduct—described by the judge as a ‘masterclass in gaslighting’—included hiding a £9.5m deferred payment from the sale of a port acquired post-separation. Despite his claims that the port was non-matrimonial, the court found its value rooted in marital assets and efforts
In his latest 'Civil way' column for this week's NLJ, Stephen Gold delivers a witty roundup of procedural updates and judicial oddities. From the rise in litigant-in-person hourly rates (£24 from October) to the Supreme Court’s venue hire options (canapés in Courtroom 1, anyone?), Gold blends legal insight with dry humour
David Bailey-Vella of Davis Woolfe and chair of the Association of Costs Lawyers explores the new costs budgeting light pilot scheme in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll