header-logo header-logo

The future of costs

20 May 2014 / Dominic Regan
Categories: Opinion , Jackson
printer mail-detail

Attempting to quantify the worth of lawyers poses a dilemma, say Dominic Regan

Costs reform is far from over. One might think that after the welter of changes last year litigators would be left to recuperate. Not so. 

The next body blow is likely in the imminent review of guideline hourly rates. Given the ravenous appetite to cut costs in every quarter how likely is it that any increase in rates will be suggested? On the contrary, my sense is that cuts are coming. 

In a fix

Lord Justice Jackson has recently expressed both orally and in print his fervent wish for fixed costs to be imposed upon all fast-track litigation. To date, we only have this in injury cases which occurred recently. There are vast swathes of cases worth up to £25,000 where costs remain at large. The Jackson motivation is two-fold. Fixed costs, one can safely presume, would be pitched at less than the current going rate. Also, giddy doubts about what costs are proportionate under the new April 2013 test would

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Oliver Banks

Slater Heelis—Oliver Banks

Manchester firm strengthens Court of Protection expertise with partner hire

Talbots Law—Sara Pickerin & Nicholas Playford

Talbots Law—Sara Pickerin & Nicholas Playford

Agricultural law team expands with senior director appointments

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

NEWS
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold dives into the quirks of civil practice, from the Court of Appeal’s fierce defence of form N510 to fresh reminders about compliance and interest claims, in this week's Civil Way
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) has restated a fundamental truth, writes John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke, in this week's NLJ: only authorised persons can conduct litigation. The decision sparked alarm, but Gould stresses it merely confirms the Legal Services Act 2007
The government’s decision to make the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) the Single Professional Services Supervisor marks a watershed in the UK’s fight against money laundering, says Rebecca Hughes of Corker Binning in this week's NLJ. The FCA will now oversee 60,000 firms across legal and accountancy sectors—a massive expansion of remit that raises questions over resources and readiness 
The High Court's decision in Parfitt v Jones [2025] EWHC 1552 (Ch) provided a striking reminder of the need to instruct the right expert in retrospective capacity assessments, says Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell in NLJ this week
Paige Coulter of Quinn Emanuel reports on the UK’s first statutory definition of SLAPPs under the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll