header-logo header-logo

08 May 2019
Issue: 7839 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Banking , Commercial , Technology
printer mail-detail

Future disputes under the microscope

Brexit will not have the ‘dramatic effect’ on financial services disputes that some people have predicted, the Chancellor of the High Court has said.

Sir Geoffrey Vos, giving a speech on this issue during London International Disputes Week this week, pointed out that English common law, which is ‘predictable and consistent’, will not be affected by Brexit at all. English business and property courts have ‘unrivalled expertise’. Moreover, he said, ‘my experience suggests that the most important things are the rule of law, the integrity of the judges and the system, and the quality of the judges.’

While post-Brexit reciprocal enforcement of judgments between EU member states and the UK has not yet been agreed, he said he ‘would not expect if to be long delayed’.

The biggest issue, he said, is smart legal contracts, since there will ‘soon be three trillion borderless smart legal financial services contracts every year’. The UK’s Law Tech Delivery Panel is currently working on plans for a dispute resolution process for this. 

Issue: 7839 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , Banking , Commercial , Technology
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll