header-logo header-logo

12 March 2010
Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The Future for E-Disclosure

His Honour Judge Brown QC has urged judges and practitioners to undergo training on electronic disclosure (e-disclosure) to avoid potential costly mistakes.

Speaking in Sydney to the Ark Group Australia International Conference last week, Judge Brown outlined the future of e-disclosure. Judge Brown said the Jackson report on civil litigation costs reminded judges of their duty to “actively manage” cases including the “direction and control of disclosure to ensure it does not get out of hand”.

Two recent cases have revealed the expense of making mistakes with e-disclosure, Digicel (St Lucia) v Cable & Wireless  [2008] EWHC 2522 (Ch) and Earles v Barclays Bank plc [2009] EWHC 2500 (Mercantile).
In ‘Digicel’, the defendants spent more than £2 million on electronic searches, but the judge ordered that these be re-done using different keywords.

In ‘Earles’, the judge found that neither of the parties had given proper disclosure and consequently neither party had taken steps to preserve potentially relevant phone or email records. The court found that the conduct of e-disclosure by the bank had fallen below expected standards and took this into account when allocating costs.

Judge Brown said the ‘Earles’ case “stresses the vital importance of e-disclosure in modern civil litigation where almost everyone is unwittingly recording everything they do or say on ESI devices such as mobile phones and computers.

“It exposes serious flaws in the understanding and practices of lawyers, even in blue chip firms and companies, of what is required in electronic disclosure and the lack of data control, retention and readiness strategies in even the largest most sophisticated organizations where electronic records are a modern way of business life. It also demonstrates that the current Practice Direction on electronic disclosure is barely adequate and does not provide sufficient guidance to civil litigation lawyers with e-phobia.”

The Rule Committee is due to produce a new e-disclosure Practice Direction and Questionnaire in October. A costs budgeting pilot, which includes requirements to budget for e-disclosure, is currently taking place at the specialist courts at Birmingham Civil Justice Centre, where Judge Brown is a specialist mercantile judge.
 

Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll