header-logo header-logo

21 July 2017
Issue: 7755 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Gaps in EU residency status

UK’s post-Brexit status offer falls short of expectations

Key differences exist between the UK’s offer and the EU’s offer on post-Brexit residency status of EU citizens and their family members, with some people falling through the gaps of both, says Jonathan Kingham, LexisPSL.

Writing in NLJ this week, Kingham points out that the UK’s offer appears to fall short of the EU offer. The EU has proposed guaranteed lifetime residence rights for UK citizens residing in the EU on the withdrawal date or who have previously resided in the EU. However, the UK government has proposed granting eligible EU citizens and their family members ‘settled status’, or the ability to acquire it within a limited time.

Kingham says: ‘Settled status appears to be very similar to the existing status of indefinite leave to remain.’ Moreover, current uncertainty over the specified cut-off date is ‘not helpful’, he says. ‘Any cut-off date earlier than Brexit day would be highly unsatisfactory for people who have moved to the UK since 29 March, for example, to take up a job.’

Conditions for family members joining an EU citizen after the date of withdrawal may be even more difficult. Just like family members of British citizens, partners will need to meet the minimum income threshold requirements, while dependent parents and grandparents will have to qualify under the domestic Adult Dependent Relatives rules which, Kingham says, ‘are virtually impossible to meet’.

And some categories of people are excluded from both the UK and the EU proposal, leaving their future uncertain—including those here under EU ‘derivative’ rights of residence, and self-employed or employed Turkish nationals and their families resident in the UK under measures related to the EC Association Agreement with Turkey.

Issue: 7755 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll