header-logo header-logo

25 January 2018
Issue: 7778 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Gauke refuses Worboys ban

nlj_7778_news_1

The Lord Chancellor has come under fire over the John Worboys issue for the second time since his appointment.

David Gauke refused to give his support this week to a call to ban Worboys, the taxi driver rapist who is due for release, from the Greater London area where some of his victims live.

Gauke told MPs that the ‘most stringent’ licensing conditions will be placed on the convicted rapist, but that ‘when it comes to the precise conditions those are operational matters that are decided at an operational level’.

Last week, Gauke was criticised for indicating that he was considering a judicial review of the Parole Board’s decision to release Worboys, before backtracking on the basis it would ‘not be appropriate’ for him to proceed. Meanwhile, the charity Centre for Women’s Justice is set to launch a judicial review this week. Harriet Wistrich, Birnberg Peirce partner, who is acting for the victims, said Gauke’s decision did not weaken their case because the Parole Board was the Ministry of Justice’s creation ‘and he cannot therefore challenge his own rules’.

Wistrich sent a letter before claim on the Centre’s behalf last week threatening judicial review on the basis that a blanket policy preventing publication of the Parole Board’s reasons is unlawful in a case where there is overriding public interest and widespread concern among the public; and the decision to release Worboys in light of all the known facts ‘appears to be wholly irrational’.

Gauke (pictured with entourage) was sworn in to his new role only last week.

Issue: 7778 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll