header-logo header-logo

25 October 2007
Issue: 7294 / Categories: Legal News , Tribunals , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-detail

Gay resignation

In brief

A magistrate who claims he was forced to resign rather than rule on cases that involve the placement of children with adoptive gay parents has taken his case to an employment tribunal. Andrew McClintock stood down from his position on the family panel of the South Yorkshire Bench after he was denied an opt out of cases that would contradict his Christian beliefs. The case has been brought under the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/1660) which protect office holders against discrimination on religious grounds. The government said that judges and magistrates could not choose which parts of general law they wish to apply.

Issue: 7294 / Categories: Legal News , Tribunals , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys—Maggie Kwok & George Weston

Harneys senior leadership appointments

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths—Keith Browne & Jim Jordan

Freeths strengthens London Construction and Engineering practice with two strategic senior hires

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins—Laura Moss

Anthony Collins announces strategic hire to deepen skills base in the social business sector

NEWS
Existing defamation law can respond to AI ‘hallucinations’, but allocating responsibility will prove harder where outputs reach users without human intervention
The High Court has upheld a rare successful serious-irregularity challenge after an arbitrator relied on an implied term neither party had advanced
Thirty years after The Future of Law shook a profession still using fax machines, its central forecast looks increasingly less like prophecy and more like description
More than 100 teams from the legal and financial services sectors competed in five sports at the 51st Law Society RFC Festival of Sport earlier this month
Part-time status need only be an effective cause of less favourable treatment, rather than the sole cause, the Supreme Court has held in Augustine v Data Cars
back-to-top-scroll