header-logo header-logo

25 October 2007
Issue: 7294 / Categories: Legal News , Tribunals , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-detail

Gay resignation

In brief

A magistrate who claims he was forced to resign rather than rule on cases that involve the placement of children with adoptive gay parents has taken his case to an employment tribunal. Andrew McClintock stood down from his position on the family panel of the South Yorkshire Bench after he was denied an opt out of cases that would contradict his Christian beliefs. The case has been brought under the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/1660) which protect office holders against discrimination on religious grounds. The government said that judges and magistrates could not choose which parts of general law they wish to apply.

Issue: 7294 / Categories: Legal News , Tribunals , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Maryam Syed KC, Church Court Chambers

NLJ Career Profile: Maryam Syed KC, Church Court Chambers

From childhood dreams of the Bar to some of the country's most challenging cases, Maryam Syed KC explains why she has never stopped standing up for others

DAC Beachcroft—Richard Breavington, Rachel Ford & Daniel Guilfoyle

DAC Beachcroft—Richard Breavington, Rachel Ford & Daniel Guilfoyle

DAC Beachcroft significantly expands Cyber team, hiring three Cyber partners

Browne Jacobson—Professor Clive Kay

Browne Jacobson—Professor Clive Kay

Browne Jacobson appoints senior healthcare leader Professor Clive Kay as strategic adviser

NEWS
As family justice moves further away from the courtroom, collaborative law is emerging as an increasingly important route to resolving separation disputes
A busy period for employment law is producing important lessons for employers, employees and tribunals alike
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll