header-logo header-logo

11 February 2026
Issue: 8149 / Categories: Legal News , Company , Risk management , International , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

General counsel role in flux, says report

The current state of geopolitics is so volatile it is ‘fundamentally reshaping’ the role of general counsel, according to a report by a global network of law firms

Lex Mundi’s 2026 General Counsel Summit report, published this week, highlights how state intervention, sanctions and extraterritorial regulation are increasingly disrupting investment and supply chains. This in turn is weakening contract reliability and regulatory stability.

The report argues general counsel must move beyond traditional scenario planning and instead focus on the ability to use disruption to their advantage. To do this, they must build an ‘antifragile framework’ by identifying elements of the business prone to break under stress—the report offers the examples of overcentralised decision-making, super-optimisation of processes leaving little room for volatility, opaque systems that may suppress undesirable information, and inflexible standardisation across jurisdictions. These pitfalls may apply specifically to the coordination of cross-border legal advice as well as more generally.

General counsel should, the report suggests, embrace ‘optionality’, for example, by fostering parallel supplier relationships so the company can pivot in the event of a geopolitical or regulatory shift.

The report, ‘Embracing geodisruption: general counsel, corporate diplomacy and antifragility’, draws on insight from senior corporate counsel at multinationals and other experts who attended its summit in Versailles in October.

Helena Samaha, CEO and president of Lex Mundi, said: ‘Legal leaders are no longer operating solely as advisers on compliance and risk, but as strategic partners engaged in corporate diplomacy—navigating divergent regulatory regimes, managing sensitive stakeholder relationships, and helping boards make decisions in conditions of profound uncertainty.

‘What distinguishes leading organisations today is their ability to build anti-fragility: the capacity to adapt, respond and even gain strength from volatility. That requires global perspective, deep local insight and legal teams that are empowered to anticipate change rather than react to it.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—James Inness

Sidley—James Inness

Partner joins capital markets team in London office

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Firm announces appointment of partner as UK general counsel

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Firm appoints first chief marketing officer to drive growth strategy

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll