header-logo header-logo

Get informed

06 June 2014 / Natasha Phillips
Issue: 7609 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Natasha Phillips underlines the importance of mortgage capacity assessments in divorce proceedings

April 26 2014 marked a significant change in the world of mortgage lending. Changes following the Mortgage Market Review were implemented on this date and the biggest shake-up happened within the realms of affordability. It is now official that mortgage lenders are responsible for assessing whether applicants can afford any potential new mortgage and with emphasis on how badly this was handled pre-recession, mortgage providers are taking things very seriously. With changes to criteria and more complex affordability calculations it has made it increasingly difficult for the average person to get a good idea of their likely mortgage borrowing. Some banks have even stated that potential borrowers will need to spend up to 2.5 hours with an adviser to assess their affordability. For those dealing with divorce who are in need of their own or their client’s mortgage capacity for financial negotiations, mediation or as information at court, there may be few resources available to get this information.

Expert advice

They can, however, have their

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll