header-logo header-logo

Get your facts straight

23 May 2013 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7561 / Categories: Opinion , Judicial review
printer mail-detail
hires_13

The government needs to review its case against judicial review, says Jon Robins

“The ‘144’ figure touted by the Lord Chancellor is not just misleading, it’s meaningless.”

On Radio 4’s Today programme at the end of last month the Lord Chancellor, Chris Grayling, offered the following killer statistic by way of illustration of the true horror of the judicial review “problem”. “In 2011, there were 11,359 applications for judicial review,” he told listeners. “In the end, 144 were successful and all of the rest of them tied up government lawyers, local authority lawyers in time, in expense for a huge number of cases of which virtually none were successful.”

Damning statistics?

So, on our Lord Chancellor’s analysis, less than 1.5% of judicial reviews (JRs) were successful which, surely, suggests that something has gone very wrong with this most crucial legal mechanism for holding government and its agencies to account. “We’re not saying there shouldn’t be JR,” Grayling told John Humphrys. “We’re not saying that members of the public and organisations should

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Kadie Bennett, Anthony Collins

NLJ Career Profile: Kadie Bennett, Anthony Collins

Kadie Bennett, senior associate at Anthony Collins and chair of the Resolution West Midlands Group, discusses her long-standing passion for family law and calls for unity in the profession

Osborne Clarke—Lara Burch

Osborne Clarke—Lara Burch

Firm appoints new UK senior partner for 2026

Keoghs—Louise Jackson & Katie Everson

Keoghs—Louise Jackson & Katie Everson

Healthcare and sports legal team expands in the north west

NEWS
Lawyers and users of the business and property courts are invited to share their views on disclosure, in particular the operation of PD 57AD and the use of Technology Assisted Review (TAR) and artificial intelligence (AI)
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
back-to-top-scroll