header-logo header-logo

22 August 2014 / Sue Nash
Categories: Opinion , Procedure & practice , Costs , Budgeting
printer mail-detail

Getting to grips

Costs lawyers are in demand following the Jackson shake-up, but there is no room for complacency, says Sue Nash

More than a year on and the impact of the Jackson reforms on litigation in England and Wales is starting to push law firms into making significant changes to their working practices. Most firms continue to work on large caseloads taken on prior to their 1 April 2013 introduction, and while we have not quite seen the “big bang” predicted by many, what is evident is the significant evolution happening in the way cases are run.

The Association of Costs Lawyers’ (ACL) annual survey of members gives a real insight into the world of post-Jackson litigation and the consequences of the new budgetary regime.

Most striking for costs lawyers has been the significant rise in demand for their specialist skills. Some 59% of those surveyed said the reforms have led them to expand their practices, with half taking on new staff as a result.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll