Vijay Ganapathy provides an update on the importance of procedure and practice in and out of court
- Applying the three-stage test in Denton v White.
- Should a defendant be allowed to rely on statistical life expectancy expert evidence?
- Carey v Vauxhall Motors Limited—the first English court decision in a secondary exposure case.
So far this year we have seen the courts addressing a variety of issues. Starting with procedure, an issue that keeps coming back to the courts for consideration is the sanctions that ought to be applied when a party fails to comply with court orders, rules or practice directions.
Denton v TH White Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 906, [2015] 1 All ER 880 sets out the three-stage test for considering when such a party should be granted relief from sanctions. This test requires consideration of the following: the ‘seriousness or significance’ of the breach; whether a ‘good reason’ has been demonstrated for this; and ‘all the circumstances of the case’, which in
-sophie-hughes-(r).tmb-mov69x69.jpg?sfvrsn=7a9dca4b_1)
