header-logo header-logo

30 April 2014 / Sue Nash
Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs , Budgeting
printer mail-detail

Getting practical

Sue Nash highlights the key teething problems of costs management

A white paper published recently by the Association of Costs Lawyers (ACL) makes it clear that costs management is not only here to stay, but will continue to spread through the litigation world.

The teething problems will take some time to pass, but there are several practical issues with the regime that the ACL would like to see addressed in the coming months.

Solicitor & own client costs

While the results of the costs management exercise do not impose a “costs cap” on recoverable costs, at CPR 3.18 the court will not depart from an approved or agreed budget unless satisfied that there is good reason to do so. There will often thus be no detailed scrutiny of the receiving party’s costs and no requirement for a bill of costs. 

It is therefore important that paying parties can be assured that the receiving party’s budget does not include costs of a solicitor and own

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll