header-logo header-logo

Getting practical

30 April 2014 / Sue Nash
Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs , Budgeting
printer mail-detail

Sue Nash highlights the key teething problems of costs management

A white paper published recently by the Association of Costs Lawyers (ACL) makes it clear that costs management is not only here to stay, but will continue to spread through the litigation world.

The teething problems will take some time to pass, but there are several practical issues with the regime that the ACL would like to see addressed in the coming months.

Solicitor & own client costs

While the results of the costs management exercise do not impose a “costs cap” on recoverable costs, at CPR 3.18 the court will not depart from an approved or agreed budget unless satisfied that there is good reason to do so. There will often thus be no detailed scrutiny of the receiving party’s costs and no requirement for a bill of costs. 

It is therefore important that paying parties can be assured that the receiving party’s budget does not include costs of a solicitor and own

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll