header-logo header-logo

Give me a break!

Ian Smith checks out the latest disputes in the world of employment law

September saw some movement on the government’s overall review of employment law, with an announcement by the Department of Business, Innovation and Skills (as part of its cutting red tape agenda) that charging for tribunal applications is to go ahead, and there is to be consultation on raising the unfair dismissal qualifying period to two years and on repealing the Equality Act 2010 (EqA 2010), s 40(2), which imposes liability on employers for harassment of employees by third parties, such as customers or clients. On the case law front, we have seen developments in two well-known pieces of litigation on diverse issues on working time; in addition there has been an interesting Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) decision on the difficult issue of forcing through pay cuts as part of a business plan.

The sky’s the limit

As the litigation in what is now Williams v British Airways plc C-155/10 proceeded through the domestic courts, it tended

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll