header-logo header-logo

Giving notice: why delivery matters

18 May 2018 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7793 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail
nlj_7793_pigott_0

Can a notice period start even when the employee has not read their dismissal letter? Charles Pigott investigates

  • The Supreme Court has decided that a contractual notice period did not start to run until the employee had read the dismissal letter.
  • It declined to imply a term that notice should run from the date the letter arrived in the post.

In Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust v Haywood [2018] SC 22, [2018] All ER (D) 110 (Apr) the Supreme Court has finally settled the question of how to calculate the date from which a written notice of dismissal starts to run, in the absence of an express term in the contract of employment.

Why the date of dismissal mattered

Ms Haywood worked for an NHS Trust. Her post was in the process of being made redundant and she was approaching her 50th birthday. She was entitled to 12 weeks’ notice and there was no express term in her contract of employment stipulating how notices were to be given.

By

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll