header-logo header-logo

18 May 2018 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7793 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Giving notice: why delivery matters

nlj_7793_pigott_0

Can a notice period start even when the employee has not read their dismissal letter? Charles Pigott investigates

  • The Supreme Court has decided that a contractual notice period did not start to run until the employee had read the dismissal letter.
  • It declined to imply a term that notice should run from the date the letter arrived in the post.

In Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust v Haywood [2018] SC 22, [2018] All ER (D) 110 (Apr) the Supreme Court has finally settled the question of how to calculate the date from which a written notice of dismissal starts to run, in the absence of an express term in the contract of employment.

Why the date of dismissal mattered

Ms Haywood worked for an NHS Trust. Her post was in the process of being made redundant and she was approaching her 50th birthday. She was entitled to 12 weeks’ notice and there was no express term in her contract of employment stipulating how notices were to be given.

By

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll